Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1210/2020

Case between Archana K Udayan vs M/s Mediahawks Advertising Private Ltd. et al regarding recovery of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-11
Duration
5 years
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Archana K Udayan, is seeking to recover amounts due from the defendants, M/s Mediahawks Advertising Private Ltd. and its Managing Director, related to share capital and salary arrears. The plaintiff has filed a petition for the production of documents needed to substantiate her claims.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition for the production of documents, indicating that the request was belated and thus not legally maintainable at this stage of the trial.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition for the production of documents, indicating that the request was belated and thus not legally maintainable at this stage of the trial.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the petition filed was not maintainable as it was made after the closure of the plaintiff's evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The present petition is filed by the plaintiff to direct the defendants to produce documents. Hence such a petition in this belated stage need not be allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Archana K Udayan
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Mediahawks Advertising Private Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Karthika Shivadas
Relation
Managing Director
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajesh Vijayendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Priyanka Gopi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sidhiqu Akbar K A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Midhun Vadakkan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aparna Shaji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R Shreyas Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
H Ramanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff filed a petition seeking directions for the production of documents by the defendants.
Evidence:
Hence the petition is liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Memorandum of Association
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document sought by the plaintiff to establish the claimed amounts and counter the defendants' allegations.
Reference:
Document Type: Minutes of Meeting of Board of Directors
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document sought by the plaintiff for the period from 11.04.2018 till 26.07.2019 to support her claims.
Reference:
Document Type: Ledger Account Details
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Details of capital account of the plaintiff from 01.04.2017 till 31.03.2020 sought by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Document Type: MGT7
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document sought to show filings made by the company to establish claims.
Reference:
MGT7 for the financial year ended 31.03.2019
Document Type: AOC4
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document sought to show filings made by the company to establish claims.
Reference:
AOC4 for the financial year ended 31.03.2019
Document Type: MGT7
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document sought by the plaintiff to support her claims.
Reference:
MGT7 for the financial year ended 31.03.2020
Document Type: AOC4
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document sought by the plaintiff to support her claims.
Reference:
AOC4 for the financial year ended 31.03.2020
Document Type: MGT7
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document sought by the plaintiff to support her claims.
Reference:
MGT7 for the financial year ended 31.03.2024
Document Type: AOC4
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document sought by the plaintiff to support her claims.
Reference:
AOC4 for the financial year ended 31.03.2024

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Archana K Udayan vs M/s Mediahawks Advertising Private Ltd. et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Archana K Udayan vs M/s Mediahawks Advertising Private Ltd. et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won