Case Summary
Aravindakshan Pillai filed a review petition against Tomy Joseph. The petition was allowed after a hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the review petition filed by Aravindakshan Pillai.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The review petition was found to have merit.
The review petition was found to have merit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The review petition was found to have merit.
The review petition was found to have merit.
Supporting Evidence
The review petition was found to have merit.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aravindakshan Pillai
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Tomy Joseph
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- G.Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T.R.Rajalekshmi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition allowed.
Evidence:
Petition allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aravindakshan Pillai vs Tomy Joseph regarding review of an order
Case Code Year
Case between Aravindakshan Pillai vs Tomy Joseph regarding review of an order