Case Summary
Aravindaksha Kurup is the plaintiff, and C.A.Pradeep is the defendant. The case revolves around the plaintiff's failure to be present or ready for evidence despite multiple opportunities.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's repeated absence and lack of readiness for evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and unpreparedness for evidence were crucial factors leading to the dismissal.
The plaintiff's absence and unpreparedness for evidence were crucial factors leading to the dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence and unpreparedness for evidence were crucial factors leading to the dismissal.
The plaintiff's absence and unpreparedness for evidence were crucial factors leading to the dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence and seeks time for evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit has been listed on multiple times. Innumerous chances were afforded for pre trial steps and the case had to be relisted for evidence on multiple occasions due to the plaintiff. Still plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence. Suit dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aravindaksha Kurup
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C.A.Pradeep
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dinesh R Shenoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Silesh S. Prabhu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.K Revi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Saumya T.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C. N Sreekumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Manju Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sabu P. Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Arya K.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Tony George Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anil Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed due to their inability to present evidence.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence and seeks time for evidence. The suit has been listed on multiple times. Innumerous chances were afforded for pre trial steps and the case had to be relisted for evidence on multiple occasions due to the plaintiff. Still plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence. Suit dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aravindaksha Kurup vs C.A.Pradeep regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Aravindaksha Kurup vs C.A.Pradeep regarding dismissal of suit