Case Summary
The case involves the plaintiff Arangath Kari Padasekhara Samithi represented by its Secretary Shaji and two defendants, Aneesha and Ajitha. The court dismissed the suit due to non-payment of costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to cost not being paid.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed with cost.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Arangath Kari Padasekhara Samithi No. K.1086/90
- Relation
- represented by its Secretary Shaji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aneesha
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o Biju
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajitha
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o Manu
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Madhu Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Saneesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Reenu.K.Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.S. Renjith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed with cost.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed with cost.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Arangath Kari Padasekhara Samithi No. K.1086/90 vs Aneesha et al regarding suit dismissal.
Case Code Year
Case between Arangath Kari Padasekhara Samithi No. K.1086/90 vs Aneesha et al regarding suit dismissal.