Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O. S. No.279/2017

Case between Antony vs Shibu et al regarding Declaration, boundary fixation, and injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-11-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The suit involves siblings Antony and Shibu disputing the boundary of their inherited property, leading to unlawful encroachment by Shibu which Antony seeks to remedy.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, Antony, granting boundary construction, removal of unauthorized wall, and restraining further encroachment by the defendant, Shibu.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, Antony, granting boundary construction, removal of unauthorized wall, and restraining further encroachment by the defendant, Shibu.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Antony
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o. Yohannan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibu
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o. Yohannan
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Will Deed No.349/2010 of SRO, Puthencruz
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission granted to construct boundary as per commission plan
Evidence:
The plaintiff is permitted to construct the boundary as shown in the Commission plan
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to remove unauthorized wall and abstain from encroaching plaintiff's property
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to remove the unauthorized wall constructed within the plaintiff's property

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Will Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff submitted this document as evidence to prove ownership of the property
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court considered this report along with a survey sketch to determine the true boundary
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Survey Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court utilized this sketch as part of the evidence for the boundary dispute
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Boundary Dispute
Case Code
Case between Antony vs Shibu et al regarding Declaration, boundary fixation, and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Antony vs Shibu et al regarding Declaration, boundary fixation, and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Suhara vs Muhammed Salam et al regarding partition and consequential injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kusumavally vs State of Kerala et al regarding Mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jose vs Kochumon @ Santhosh et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sujatha Jayaraj vs Babu Jayaraj et al regarding partition and injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won