Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1105/2022

Case between Antony Shiju et al vs T.G.Sunil et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-05-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Antony Shiju and Shabarinath Hariharan against defendants T.G.Sunil, Meena Mohan, Ravisankar, and Gopal. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' absence and no reply filed against the defendants' counterclaim. The counterclaim will proceed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' absence and no reply filed against the defendants' counterclaim. The counterclaim will proceed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear in court and did not respond to the counterclaim.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
No representation from the side of plaintiff. No replication seen filed in reply to counter claim filed by the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit is dismissed. Counter Claim shall be proceeded with.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Antony Shiju
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shabarinath Hariharan
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.G.Sunil
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Meena Mohan
Party Age
64
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ravisankar
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gopal
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sebin Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Varghese Vinu C.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ajay N.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jaya D Vargheses Kutty
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Harima Hariharan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajath R Nath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The suit was dismissed.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Antony Shiju et al vs T.G.Sunil et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Antony Shiju et al vs T.G.Sunil et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 05/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Fri, 05/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won