Case Summary
Ansari Abdul Kareem filed a petition to condone the delay of 360 days in filing a restoration petition against the dismissal of his suit for default. The delay is due to his health issues as he was bedridden following a medical condition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Condonation of delay and costs of Rs.3,000.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition to condone the delay in filing the restoration petition and imposed a cost of Rs. 3,000 on the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient grounds for condoning the delay based on the medical certificate provided by the plaintiff.
The court found sufficient grounds for condoning the delay based on the medical certificate provided by the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied with the reason for not filing restoration petition within time. This court is satisfied that there is sufficient ground to condone the delay in not filing the restoration petition within time.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the above petition is allowed on costs of Rs.3,000/-. The delay of 360 days that occurred in filing RP. 78/2024 is condoned.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ansari Abdul Kareem
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Greater Cochin Development Authority
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Medical certificate regarding health condition.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P A Abdul Jabbar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D M Sajeevan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The delay of 360 days that occurred in filing RP. 78/2024 is condoned
Evidence:
this court is satisfied that there is sufficient ground to condone the delay in not filing the restoration petition within time
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Costs imposed on the respondent amounting to Rs.3,000/-
Evidence:
the inconvenience caused to the respondent is to be adequately compensated by imposing costs
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ansari Abdul Kareem vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding condonation of delay
Case Code Year
Case between Ansari Abdul Kareem vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding condonation of delay