Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 189/2025

Case between Anoop Joseph vs Anandhu Sreekumar regarding settlement of disputes

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Judge
Sri. Hasheem S
Order Date
2025-10-29
Duration
approximately-0 years 0 days
Case Closed
Wed, 10/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anoop Joseph, the plaintiff, and Anandhu Sreekumar, the defendant, were involved in a civil suit that was finally heard and settled. A compromise agreement was filed and accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was settled between the parties and the suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was settled between the parties and the suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
All terms in the agreement are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement. The compromise agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anoop Joseph
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anandhu Sreekumar
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise agreement filed as IA No. 3/25
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manu Tom Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reena G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Navya Maria
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
IA is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court allowed the IA and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement.
Reference:
IA No. 3/25

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anoop Joseph vs Anandhu Sreekumar regarding settlement of disputes
Case Code Year
Case between Anoop Joseph vs Anandhu Sreekumar regarding settlement of disputes

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Pala, Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 10/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 10/28/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Jancy Thomas regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Hima K.S et al regarding settlement of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jilu Sebastian et al vs Mercy Pious et al regarding Suit dismissed as not pressed
MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash P. M vs Anoop P regarding settlement of a suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sukumaran Nair et al vs Thomas et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won