O.S No. 803/2020

Case between Annie Lusy A.F vs Alexander A. F, Silvi A. F regarding dismissal

Court

COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Rohit Nandakumar

Order Date

2024-08-01

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiff Annie Lusy A.F and defendants Alexander A. F and Silvi A. F. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the case being dismissed.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation during the hearing.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not present and did not provide evidence.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Case in list. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence. Name called absent. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Annie Lusy A.F
Party Age: 58
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Alexander A. F
Party Age: 61
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Silvi A. F
Party Age: 53
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Pramod J Dev
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: P. B. Pradeep
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Muhammed Niyas K.H
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Vimal Raj M.B
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Plaintiff absent; suit dismissed.

Evidence:

Plaintiff absent. No representation. D1 present. D2 represented. Case in list. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification