Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 22/2019

Case between Annamm K.M. vs K.M. Joy et al regarding injunction and partition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-03-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Annamm K.M. seeking an injunction and partition of property against K.M. Joy and others. The plaintiff alleges the defendants are refusing to partition the property which originally belonged to their common ancestor.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit, stating that the plaintiff was estopped from claiming her right over the property after having accepted a sum of money in a family settlement. The plaintiff was not found to have co-ownership over the property.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit, stating that the plaintiff was estopped from claiming her right over the property after having accepted a sum of money in a family settlement. The plaintiff was not found to have co-ownership over the property.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff had received compensation in a family settlement, effectively relinquishing her rights to the property.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff had received compensation in a family settlement, effectively relinquishing her rights to the property.
Supporting Evidence
The acceptance of the amount as her family share can be deemed to be a relinquishment of her share over the property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit stands dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Annamm K.M.
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.M. Joy
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chinnamma George
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anoop Geoge
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abin George
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of sale deed No.816/1956 of SRO, Perumbavoor
Defendants Documents
Copy of receipt.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sonnet Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ciju I.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.V. Eldho
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought for a perpetual injunction to restrain defendants from cutting and selling trees from the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In view of the above discussions, I could not find the plaintiff to be entitled for the relief sought for.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought for partitioning the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
When the plaintiff could not found to be having co-ownership over the property, she could not found to be entitled for the property to be partitioned as prayed for.
Relief Type: Share of Profits
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff claimed share of profits from the income derived from plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In that scenario, the evidence of CW1 and Ext. C1 and C1(a) does not assume any significance when the plaintiff is not entitled to get the property partitioned or to get the share allotted to her.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the partition deed evidencing the property originally belonged to Mathai.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of receipt acknowledging payment of Rs. 5,000/- as plaintiff's share in the family settlement.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Commission report and Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documents related to the income derived from the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1, C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Annamm K.M. vs K.M. Joy et al regarding injunction and partition
Case Code Year
Case between Annamm K.M. vs K.M. Joy et al regarding injunction and partition

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won