Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 211/2023

Case between Annama Paily et al vs Chakkappan et al regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Annama Paily and Saramma Mathai, filed a suit against defendants including Chakkappan and Poulose. The case was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to appear and represent their case after multiple notices.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to appear and represent their case after multiple notices.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and failed to represent in court despite being given an opportunity.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and failed to represent in court despite being given an opportunity.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was specifically posted to the date for the plaintiff to appear and submit whether he is intending to proceed with the suit. Still, plaintiff is absent and not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Annama Paily
Party Age
82
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saramma Mathai
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chakkappan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Poulose
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Eliyamma Varghese
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cherian
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o late
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shalga
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o late
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arun George D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Angel Gloria V.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sabir N.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Dismissal of the suit for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Annama Paily et al vs Chakkappan et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Annama Paily et al vs Chakkappan et al regarding suit dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won