Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 192/2022

Case between Anjana vs Deepthi et al regarding injunction

Court
Additional Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-05-26
Duration
approximately-2 years 3 months
Case Closed
Mon, 05/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Anjana, is seeking an injunction against the defendants, including Deepthi and others. The case was settled according to a mediation agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed based on a settlement agreement that resolved all rights of the parties involved. The court acknowledged the mediation agreement provided by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed based on a settlement agreement that resolved all rights of the parties involved. The court acknowledged the mediation agreement provided by the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case was settled amicably through mediation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The settlement agreement settled all rights of the parties in this suit also settled.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is decreed on the basis of settlement agreement attached in the OS.No. 505/2021.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anjana
Party Age
26
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepthi
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayamma
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Athira
Party Age
36
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Decree of OS.505/21, Settlement agreement dated 10/02/2023
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anil Kumar A. Mulankadakam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Balakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. S. Arunkumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kundara Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed on the basis of the settlement agreement.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is decreed on the basis of settlement agreement attached in the OS.No. 505/2021

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referred to the mediation agreement dated 10/02/2023 and the decree of OS.505/21 to base its judgment on the settlement.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anjana vs Deepthi et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Anjana vs Deepthi et al regarding injunction

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 02/10/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 05/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won