Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.507/2018

Case between Anitha.R. vs Little Flower Tempo Garage regarding settlement of a suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-01
Duration
approximately-5 years 10 months
Case Closed
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anitha.R. filed a suit against Little Flower Tempo Garage and others. The matter was settled out of court with a joint compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court satisfied that the terms of the compromise are lawful and decreed the suit and counter claim in terms of the compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of entire court fees including Legal Benefit Fund
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court satisfied that the terms of the compromise are lawful and decreed the suit and counter claim in terms of the compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties settled the matter out of court and satisfied the court with the lawful terms of the compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties settled the matter out of court and satisfied the court with the lawful terms of the compromise.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that the terms of compromise are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit and Counter Claim decreed in terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anitha.R.
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Little Flower Tempo Garage
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joseph Roy Pererah
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.B. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sebastian.V.A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.P. Aravindakshan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit and Counter Claim decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Submitted matter settled between parties out of court. Joint compromise filed. Heard. Satisfied that the terms of compromise are lawful.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anitha.R. vs Little Flower Tempo Garage regarding settlement of a suit
Case Code Year
Case between Anitha.R. vs Little Flower Tempo Garage regarding settlement of a suit

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 04/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won