O.S No. 945/2025

Case between Anil Pavunny Elias vs K.P.Ramesh @ Karthikeyan regarding interim prohibitory injunction

Court

COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Rohit Nandakumar

Order Date

2025-11-11

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anil Pavunny Elias filed a petition seeking an interim prohibitory injunction against K.P.Ramesh @ Karthikeyan. The case involves a dispute over property where the plaintiff alleges interference in his ability to sell the property after a failed sale agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant and his agents from obstructing the plaintiff's use and enjoyment of the property until further orders.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

An order of interim injunction was passed restraining the respondent from interfering with the plaintiff's enjoyment of the property.

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant and his agents from obstructing the plaintiff's use and enjoyment of the property until further orders.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case and balance of convenience in his favor.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner established a prima facie case and balance of convenience in his favor.

Supporting Evidence

The petitioner has established a prima facie case and balance of convenience in his favour and that there is a possibility of irreparable injury also in favour of the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

An order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondent or any persons claiming through or under him from obstructing or interfering with the user, enjoyment and possession of injunction A schedule property by the plaintiff in any manner, until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Anil Pavunny Elias
Party Age: 63
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: K.P.Ramesh @ Karthikeyan
Party Age: 65
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

True photo copy of Agreement of Sale dated 15.05.2023

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Arjun S
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: C. Devanand
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K.G Devipriya
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Ushakumari M.K
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: C. Kiran Dev
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: R. Devanarayanan
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K.M. Subramania Iyer
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: S. Devadevan
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Vishnu Santhosh
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

An order of interim injunction was passed restraining the respondent from obstructing or interfering with the user, enjoyment and possession of the property by the plaintiff until the final disposal of the suit.

Evidence:

In view of these facts, an order of interim injunction is passed as against the respondent restraining the respondent or persons claiming through or under him or his agents and men from in obstructing or interfering with the user, enjoyment and possession of injunction A schedule property (plaint A schedule property) by the plaintiff in any manner, till the final disposal of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement of Sale

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

This document is the agreement between the plaintiff and defendant regarding the sale of the property.

Reference:

Ext.A1

Document Type: Commission Report

Submitted By: Court