Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 121/2018

Case between Anil Kumar et al vs C B Udayakumar et al regarding restoration of suit.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-12-04
Duration
approximately-1 year 11 months
Case Code No.
121
Case Closed
Thu, 12/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Anil Kumar, Dr. Jayakumar, and Dr. Ajithakumari, sought to restore a previously dismissed civil suit. The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs, primarily because of the first plaintiff's illness.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed both the application for condonation of delay and the restoration petition. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed both the application for condonation of delay and the restoration petition. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The court found no sufficient reasons or evidence to condone the delay in filing the restoration application.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
There is absolutely no materials before the Court to show that the petitioner was prevented from filing a petition to restore the suit within the time prescribed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/2025 and RP 154/2025 are dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anil Kumar
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Jayakumar
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Ajithakumari
Party Age
66
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C B Udayakumar
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh Babu
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Secretary, Kollam Municipal Corporation
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Chandrasenan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Condonation of delay in filing RP 154/2025 and restoration of the suit
Evidence:
Consequently, the application for condonation of delay is devoid of merit.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Restoration of the suit on file
Evidence:
In view of my finding on point No.1, this point does not germane for consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam District
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 12/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Satheesh et al vs Ajayan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Babu Chandhar et al vs Sarada Chandhatty et al regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Parukutti Amma et al vs Abdul Rahim regarding restoration of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won