Case Summary
The case involves Anandhu Krishanan as the plaintiff seeking a permanent injunction. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendants during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anandhu Krishanan
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anila
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anitha P. G.
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Shafeek
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Haripriya S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Latheesh R. Prasad.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
The suit is filed by the Plaintiff for permanent injunction.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the Plaintiff for permanent injunction u/s 26, O. VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anandhu Krishanan vs Anila et al regarding permanent injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Anandhu Krishanan vs Anila et al regarding permanent injunction