Case Summary
The petition is filed by the plaintiff to set aside an earlier order and restore the suit on file. Both sides were represented in the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed to restore the suit on file.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed based on the representation from both sides.
The petition was allowed based on the representation from both sides.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Both sides represented. Costs paid. Memo filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Petition allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anandavalliyamma
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sudharma
- Relation
- Additional Plaintiff No.2
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajendran Pillai
- Relation
- Additional Plaintiff No.3
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lekha
- Relation
- Additional Plaintiff No.4
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ajayakumar
- Relation
- Additional Plaintiff No.5
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreemathiyamma
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Thattamala M.Navas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition to set aside the order dated 30-11-2024 and to restore the suit on file.
Evidence:
Petition allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anandavalliyamma et al vs Sreemathiyamma regarding restoration of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Anandavalliyamma et al vs Sreemathiyamma regarding restoration of suit