O.S No. 416/2020

Case between Ambujakshi et al vs Joseph et al regarding dismissal for default

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Nanda Krishna M.

Order Date

2025-04-03

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Ambujakshi and others, were involved in a civil suit against the defendants, Joseph and others. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were absent and not represented in court.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were absent and did not submit any proof affidavit.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs were absent and did not submit any proof affidavit.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff absent. Not represented. No proof affidavit seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Ambujakshi
Party Age: 88
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Narayanakutty
Party Age: 55
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Prasannan
Party Age: 50

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Joseph
Party Age: 60

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: M.P.Francis

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Chakkappan
Party Age: 55

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Annamma
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Vipin
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Resmi Nandanan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: M.Manoj Kumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: T.K.Ajith Kumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and the lack of a proof affidavit.

Evidence: