Case Summary
This case involves the plaintiff Ambujakshan and multiple defendants including Sasi and Shibu. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of necessary proof.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and the inability to produce necessary documentation. The court found that the petitions filed by the plaintiff were intended to prolong the litigation process.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff failed to appear and provide necessary proof for the case.
The court found that the plaintiff failed to appear and provide necessary proof for the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff failed to appear and provide necessary proof for the case.
The court found that the plaintiff failed to appear and provide necessary proof for the case.
Supporting Evidence
No proof affidavit seen filed. The plaintiff was absent and no steps taken by him during the pre-trial stage.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ambujakshan
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sasi
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shibu
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mini
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pankajakshan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Appu
- Party Age
- 82
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arun George D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sushanth Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sidharth O
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Albina A Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
IA 6/25 and IA 5/25 dismissed as they were filed to protract the litigation.
Evidence:
Therefore, the present petitions can only be considered to have been filed to protract the litigation. Hence, IA 6/25 and IA 5/25 are dismissed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, IA 6/25 and IA 5/25 are dismissed. Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ambujakshan vs Sasi et al regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Ambujakshan vs Sasi et al regarding suit dismissal