Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 647/2022

Case between All Travancore Sri Padmanabha Vilasam Hindu Cheramar Mahajana Sangham vs Salimon K P regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-04-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, represented by T M Ramanan, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Salimon K P, who is attempting to act as an office bearer of the All Travancore Sri Padmanabha Vilasam Hindu Cheramar Mahajana Sangham. The court evaluated the claims and evidence presented by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit with costs, finding that the plaintiffs failed to prove their case. It was determined that the plaintiffs did not have the authority to file the suit or represent the interests of the Sangham.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit with costs, finding that the plaintiffs failed to prove their case. It was determined that the plaintiffs did not have the authority to file the suit or represent the interests of the Sangham.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to establish their claims and did not provide sufficient evidence to support their position.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to establish their claims and did not provide sufficient evidence to support their position.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs have not adduced evidence to show that he is the President of the Sangam and defendant is trying to deny the same. Further, when a decree for declaration is sought, the plaintiff has burden to prove that his right is being denied by the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
All Travancore Sri Padmanabha Vilasam Hindu Cheramar Mahajana Sangham
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T M Ramanan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Salimon K P
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original bye law of the All Travancore Sri Padmanabha Vilasam Hindu Cheramar Mahajana Sangham, The registration particulars of All Travancore Sri Padmanabha Vilasam Hindu Cheramar Mahajana Sangham, Copy of Judgment on WP(c) No. 21063/2020, Judgment in WP(c) 28382/2021 of the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K Mohammed Rafeeq
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amarnath R Lal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lithin Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from acting as or claiming to be an office bearer of the Sangham.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is not authorised to represent the 1st plaintiff. Also plaintiff is not entitled to a decree of prohibitory injunction as claimed for.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Declaration that the second plaintiff, Mr. T.M. Ramanan, is the rightful President of the Sangham.
Evidence:
Plaintiff has failed to prove his case. Hence suit is liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original bye law of the All Travancore Sri Padmanabha Vilasam Hindu Cheramar Mahajana Sangom
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the governance structure and leadership of the Sangham.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: The registration particulars of All Travancore Sri Padmanabha Vilasam Hindu Cheramar Mahajana Sangom
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed the legal registration details of the plaintiffs' organization.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Judgment on WP(c) No. 21063/2020
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided context regarding previous litigation related to the registrar's refusal.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Judgment in WP(c) 28382/2021 of the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Affirmed the need for plaintiffs to seek civil court relief regarding their dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between All Travancore Sri Padmanabha Vilasam Hindu Cheramar Mahajana Sangham vs Salimon K P regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between All Travancore Sri Padmanabha Vilasam Hindu Cheramar Mahajana Sangham vs Salimon K P regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won