OS. No. 583/2022

Case between Aleyamma et al vs Sidney Samuel et al regarding Declaration

Court

IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-08-12

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Aleyamma and Shiny Samuel are the plaintiffs, while Sidney Samuel, Shyla Elizabeth Samuel, and Jude Patrick James are the defendants. The suit was filed for a declaration but was rejected due to balance court fee not being remitted.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court rejected the plaint due to the balance court fee not being remitted. Therefore, the case did not proceed further.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court rejected the plaint due to the balance court fee not being remitted. Therefore, the case did not proceed further.

Key Reasoning:
Plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.

Supporting Evidence

Both sides represented. Balance Court Fee not remitted.

Judgment Evidence:

Balance Court Fee not remitted. Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Aleyamma
Party Age: 71
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Shiny Samuel
Party Age: 49
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sidney Samuel
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shyla Elizabeth Samuel
Party Age: 43
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jude Patrick James
Party Age: 46

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: S.G.Jayan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Saju George
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Plaintiffs sought a declaration but the plaint was rejected due to balance court fee not remitted.

Evidence: