Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 96/2025

Case between Akshaya vs Seena regarding declaration and partition

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-10-08
Duration
approximately-11 years
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Akshaya, the plaintiff, seeking a declaration of civil death for her mother, Seena, who has been missing for over 11 years. The plaintiff is also requesting partition of the property inherited from her deceased father.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court denied the request for declaration of civil death of the defendant but granted a preliminary decree for partition, awarding the plaintiff half of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaint schedule property is divided into 2 equal parts, and the plaintiff is entitled to get 1/2 share over the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court denied the request for declaration of civil death of the defendant but granted a preliminary decree for partition, awarding the plaintiff half of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved her entitlement to a partition of the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The only factor to be considered is whether the court can declare the civil death of the defendant, the mother of plaintiff whose whereabouts were not known for more than 7 years.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed in part and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: 1)The plaint schedule property is divided into 2 equal parts and the plaintiff is entitled to get 1/2 share over the plaint schedule property and has got absolute right over the house situated in the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Akshaya
Party Age
22
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Seena
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Assignment Deed No. 2105/2012 of SRO, Kavilumpara, Basic Tax Receipt issued by Village Office, Maruthonkara to Pavithran
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Bindu Puthiyarakkal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Fathima Suhara
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
To declare the civil death of the defendant.
Evidence:
The first relief as to the declaration of the civil death is hereby denied.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Preliminary decree for partition separating the share of the plaintiff from that of the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed in part and a preliminary decree for partition is passed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Title deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The title deed of the plaintiff shows that the plaint schedule property was in the position of the father of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
As per Ext.A2 he was paying tax with respect to plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between Akshaya vs Seena regarding declaration and partition
Case Code Year
Case between Akshaya vs Seena regarding declaration and partition

Case Flags

Arrest Involved

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between VAZHAYIL POYIL MARIYAM vs PEETTOLLATHIL SHAMSUDHEEN regarding partition of property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Korothkandiyil Afnitha @ Hasniba vs Korothkandiyil Mami et al regarding partition and separate possession
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meethale Palollathil Kannan et al vs Kuniyil Kannan et al regarding final decree application
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Saroja vs Sushanth et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KOORIKKANDIYIL ABHIRAMI vs KOORIKKANDIYIL BABU @ SASIBHOOSHAN regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won