Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1005/2024

Case between Ajithkumar et al vs Asha Sagar et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-10-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Ajithkumar and Anilkumar, were involved in a legal dispute with defendants Asha Sagar and Aparna. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' continuous absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' continuous absence and lack of representation in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' continuous absence and lack of representation in court.
Key Reasoning:
The continuous absence of the plaintiff indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The continuous absence of the plaintiff indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the case.
Supporting Evidence
Clearly, the plaintiff is not interested in proceeding further with the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajithkumar
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anilkumar
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asha Sagar
Party Age
62
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aparna
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.T.Harikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Г.В.Тhanкарpаn
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dipin Dileep
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Clearly, the plaintiff is not interested in proceeding further with the suit. Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ajithkumar et al vs Asha Sagar et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Ajithkumar et al vs Asha Sagar et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won