Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 115/2016

Case between Ajitha Kumary vs Vinu regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-9 years 1 day
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ajitha Kumary filed a suit against Vinu for a perpetual prohibitory injunction. The matter was settled between the parties through mediation and they entered into a compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise made by the parties. The court fees paid by the Plaintiffs will be refunded and there is no order as to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fees paid by the Plaintiffs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise made by the parties. The court fees paid by the Plaintiffs will be refunded and there is no order as to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties settled the matter through mediation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties settled the matter through mediation.
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajitha Kumary
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinu
Party Age
30
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
D. Baijukumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S. Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S. Reeja
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Plakkadu B.J. Shibu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
the suit is decreed in its terms
Evidence:
Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ajitha Kumary vs Vinu regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ajitha Kumary vs Vinu regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won