Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 1009/2015

Case between Aji vs Sudhakaran regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-10-27
Duration
approximately-2 years 29 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Aji, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Sudhakaran for the realization of money. The plaintiff's absence due to health issues led to the dismissal of the suit for default, prompting Aji to seek restoration of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The applications for restoration of the suit were dismissed as the delay was not adequately explained. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The applications for restoration of the suit were dismissed as the delay was not adequately explained. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The delay of 435 days in filing the petition to restore was deemed unexplained and an attempt to prolong proceedings.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
There is absolutely no materials before the Court to show that the petitioner was prevented from filing a petition to restore the suit within the time prescribed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/2025 and RP 27/2025 are dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aji
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudhakaran
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Application for condonation of delay in filing the restoration petition.
Evidence:
Consequently, the application for condonation of delay is devoid of merit.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Restoration of the suit.
Evidence:
In view of my finding on point No.1, this point does not germane for consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aji vs Sudhakaran regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Aji vs Sudhakaran regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won