Case Summary
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for realisation of money. The plaintiff and defendants were absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff. No representation was made by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The non-representation of the plaintiff indicates that he was not interested in proceeding with the suit.
The non-representation of the plaintiff indicates that he was not interested in proceeding with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ajayakumar
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Renuka Kumari
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Megha Sathyan
- Party Age
- 19
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manoj Joseph Andrews
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R. Bahuleyan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajitha T. R.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence
Evidence:
Non representation of plaintiff indicates that not interested to proceed with suit. Suit dismissed for default
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ajayakumar vs Renuka Kumari et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Ajayakumar vs Renuka Kumari et al regarding realisation of money