Case Summary
Ahammed Kabir filed a suit for a prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, while the defendant was represented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and representation by the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ahammed Kabir
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nazeema
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Siddique
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thaufeek
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thareeq
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Saiju C K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Meenu Das S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Priji P A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Suni Mol.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit for prohibitory injunction
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for prohibitory injunction u/s 26 u/O VII R.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ahammed Kabir vs Nazeema et al regarding prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ahammed Kabir vs Nazeema et al regarding prohibitory injunction