Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 745/2019

Case between Agnes Hillari vs Thresyamma George et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-11-11
Duration
approximately-6 years 0 days
Case Closed
Tue, 11/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Agnes Hillari, seeks a declaration of ownership and a permanent injunction against the defendants who claim rights over the property. The court found that the plaintiff has been in continuous and exclusive possession of the property since 1986.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff possesses title over the property by adverse possession and restrained the defendants from interrupting her peaceful possession.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Declaration of ownership and injunction against trespassing
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff possesses title over the property by adverse possession and restrained the defendants from interrupting her peaceful possession.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's continuous and exclusive possession since 1986 was established and uncontested.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's continuous and exclusive possession since 1986 was established and uncontested.
Supporting Evidence
The cause of action alleged in the plaint stands proved through the depositions of PW1 and PW2 and from Ext. A1 to A9 and C1 series. From the affidavit and exhibits it is clear that the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree of declaration and for permanent prohibitory injunction. There is no contra evidence to prove otherwise.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1. It is declared that the plaintiff has prescribed her possession and title over the plaint schedule property by adverse possession. 2. The defendants and their men are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from making any obstruction to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Agnes Hillari
Party Age
69
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thresyamma George
Party Age
76
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George @ Moncy
Party Age
54
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Christeena
Party Age
78
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Stephen
Party Age
58
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Romoo @ Biju
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Death Certificate of Aloysius Nazrath, Death Certificate of Mary Bella D’cruz, Death Certificate of Hillary D’Cruz, Certificate issued from Kollam Milma Dairy, Agent’s identity card, Resurvey Plan, Copy of Thandaperu kanaku, Certificate issued from Kollam Corporation, Licence
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Ramachandran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Justin Poulose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration that the plaintiff has prescribed her possession and title over the plaint schedule property by adverse possession.
Evidence:
It is declared that the plaintiff has prescribed her possession and title over the plaint schedule property by adverse possession.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraint on defendants and their men from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendants and their men are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the death of Aloysius Nazrath.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the death of Mary Bella D’cruz.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the death of Hillary D’Cruz.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certificate from Milma Dairy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the plaintiff's claim regarding the business.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Agent’s ID card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Identifies the plaintiff as an agent for the business.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Resurvey Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Describes the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Thandaper Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of property ownership or possession.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certificate from Kollam Corporation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates compliance with municipal obligations.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: License
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal permit for running the bakery business.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Identifies the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Mahazar
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Document detailing the findings of the commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Adverse possession
Case Code
Case between Agnes Hillari vs Thresyamma George et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Agnes Hillari vs Thresyamma George et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 11/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Dr.S. Beena Kumari vs State of Kerala et al regarding temporary injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thankamma vs Suja et al regarding Declaration and Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sharon.S.P et al vs Honey.S.P regarding Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between V.M.Jayaprakasan et al vs Ushakumary et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera Biju @ Meera Gangadharan vs V.Jayaprakash et al regarding declaration and Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won