Case Summary
The petitioner, Adv. V Devashikhamony, filed a suit seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the respondents, who are the defendants including Abdul Nazar Sait, to prevent them from trespassing into certain properties. The case involves issues related to missing documents and the review of previous court orders.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition by Adv. V Devashikhamony for review of the order dated 21.07.2025 was allowed, resulting in the reopening of the case for further proceedings. The dismissal of I.A. No. 46/2025 was found to be erroneous due to non-issuance of necessary document copies.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found an error apparent on the face of the record regarding the dismissal of I.A. No. 46/2025, determining that necessary copies were not issued to the plaintiff, which warranted review.
The court found an error apparent on the face of the record regarding the dismissal of I.A. No. 46/2025, determining that necessary copies were not issued to the plaintiff, which warranted review.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that there is an error apparent on face of record in dismissing IA 46/25 as evidently carbon copies of the said order was not issued on the 21.07.2025.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, 1) The above petition is allowed. Order dated 21.07.2025 dismissing IA 46/2025 and closure of evidence and posting case for hearing is reviewed in the interest of justice.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Adv. V Devashikhamony
- Party Age
- 80
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Nazar Sait
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Additional Thahasildar, Kanayannur Taluk
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Taluk Surveyor, Kanayannur Taluk
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Village Officer, Ernakulam Village
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. V Devashikhamony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. K V Jayachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Manoj G Krishnan
- Appearance Type
- Government Pleader
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed and the order dated 21.07.2025 dismissing IA 46/2025 and closure of evidence is reviewed.
Evidence:
The above petition is allowed. Order dated 21.07.2025 dismissing IA 46/2025 and closure of evidence and posting case for hearing is reviewed in the interest of justice.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Adv. V Devashikhamony vs Abdul Nazar Sait et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Adv. V Devashikhamony vs Abdul Nazar Sait et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction