Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP.168/2024

Case between Abraham Issac et al vs Raymol Thomas et al regarding Execution Petition

Court
Additional Munsiff's Court
Judge
Smt. Indu P. Raj
Order Date
2025-10-21
Duration
Case Code No.
168
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The decree holders, Raymol Thomas and others, are involved in an execution petition against the judgment debtors, Abraham Issac and others. The court considered the execution petition and declared it fully satisfied and closed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court ordered that the execution petition is fully satisfied and closed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the execution petition is fully satisfied and closed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Decree Holder represented. Delivery effected. EP fully satisfied and closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abraham Issac
Party Age
82
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Akkamma Issac
Party Age
76
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abraham Issac
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thomas Issac
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.I.Issac
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raymol Thomas
Party Age
59
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ruby Thomas
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rejani Thomas
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Reena Thomas
Party Age
59
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biju Kurian Thomas
Party Age
42
Relation
H/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sudheesh S Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Judgment Debtor
Advocate Name
Justin David
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
EP fully satisfied and closed.
Evidence:
Delivery effected. EP fully satisfied and closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jyothilekshmi.R vs The Kottayam Wholesale Co-operative Consumer's Stores Ltd.No. K162 regarding Execution petition
Principal Munsiff's Court
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between M.M.Publications Limited vs Adger Media Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Additional Munsiff's Court
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Manosh Mani vs Mini Stanly et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Laila Sasidharan et al vs L.P Prakash et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Muhammad Riyas et al regarding execution petition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won