Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No:38/2017

Case between Abdul Razak K vs M/s Cement Traders et al regarding dishonoured cheque

Court
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate - II
Judge
Smt. Nimmi.K.K Bsc., LL.B.
Order Date
2018-08-31
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Fri, 08/31/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Razak filed a complaint against M/s Cement Traders and another accusing them of an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, which was subsequently settled resulting in the acquittal of the accused.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The accused is acquitted under Section 257 of the Cr.P.C., after the complainant submitted that the matter was settled.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal under Section 257 Cr.P.C.
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The accused is acquitted under Section 257 of the Cr.P.C., after the complainant submitted that the matter was settled.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Complainant present petition filed u/s.257 Cr.P.C. Complainant submitted matter is settled and he had put his signature voluntarily. Allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

The complaint filed by the complainant against the accused alleging commission of offense punishable u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Razak. K
Relation
S/o Ahammed Koya
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Cement Traders
Relation
Represented by Managing Partner Entheen kutty S/o Abdulla
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Entheen kutty
Relation
S/o Abdulla, Managing Partner of M/s Cement Traders
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
Tirur
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. S. Hariharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Acquittal
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Acquittal under Section 257 Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
Accused is acquitted u/s.257 Cr.P.C.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Abdul Razak K vs M/s Cement Traders et al regarding dishonoured cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Razak K vs M/s Cement Traders et al regarding dishonoured cheque

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 08/31/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/31/2018 - 12:00
From
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Fri, 08/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Indira vs Sreeja S regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won
Case between Gokulam Chit & Finance Co Pvt Ltd vs Asmabi regarding cheque dishonour
Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won
Case between Faisala vs Abdul Latheef regarding dishonoured cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won
Case between Aboobacker vs Abdul Rasak regarding cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Criminal Case - Cheque dishonour Unknown
Case between Abdul Khader vs Abdul Hameed regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Plaintiff Won