Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 964/2024

Case between Abdul Rahim T.N vs Aabasoft et al regarding a compromise suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves plaintiff Abdul Rahim T.N and defendants Aabasoft represented by Thomas Scariya and Nandu Vijayakumar. The suit was settled through a compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise submitted by the parties involved in the suit. The suit was decreed in accordance with the terms of the compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee, if applicable, as per law.
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise submitted by the parties involved in the suit. The suit was decreed in accordance with the terms of the compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties voluntarily entered into a lawful compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Heard both sides in IA. Perused the terms and found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence compromise are accepted. IA 01/2025 is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Rahim T.N
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aabasoft
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nandu Vijayakumar
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B.M. Ajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dominic Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Varghese K. Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kashmeera Ashraf
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sneha Divakaran P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anamika Sasikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.S. Ashna
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Karthika C.M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Hence compromise are accepted. IA 01/2025 is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Rahim T.N vs Aabasoft et al regarding a compromise suit
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Rahim T.N vs Aabasoft et al regarding a compromise suit

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won