Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 117/2024

Case between Abdul Manaf P. U. et al vs Manumol N. M. regarding eviction due to rent arrears

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-05-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Abdul Manaf P. U. and Nafseena T.M., are seeking eviction of the respondent, Manumol N. M., due to non-payment of rent arrears. The court found that the respondent admitted to the arrears and ordered her to pay the due amounts.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, ordering the respondent to pay the rent arrears. Specific amounts and interest rates were mandated for compliance.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order to pay rent arrears with interest
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition, ordering the respondent to pay the rent arrears. Specific amounts and interest rates were mandated for compliance.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent admitted to the rent arrears, confirming the landlord-tenant relationship.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent admitted to the rent arrears, confirming the landlord-tenant relationship.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioners have claimed for arrears since March 2024 at the rate of Rs.21,000/-pm... the respondent is liable to pay the admitted rent arrears as claimed by the petitioners.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed and a direction is passed under Section 12 (1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act against the respondent to deposit in court the monthly rent arrears.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Manaf P. U.
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nafseena T.M.
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manumol N. M.
Party Age
37
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent agreement dated 08.08.2023
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Denu Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Muhiseena V.Z.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manju M.K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joyal P. Joy
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Denizen Komath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dean Denizen Komath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Megha Madhavan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rekha V.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shimi Mol S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vijay Sreedhar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to deposit in court the monthly rent arrears of Rs.84,000/- along with 6% interest.
Evidence:
The respondent is hereby directed to deposit in court the monthly rent arrears of Rs.84,000/- (Rupees Eighty four thousand only) which is due as on June 2024, with 6% interest per annum, within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to deposit in court the monthly rent arrears of Rs.2,42,550/- along with 6% interest.
Evidence:
The respondent is also hereby directed to deposit in court the monthly rent arrears of Rs.2,42,550/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Forty Two Thousand Five hundred and Fifty only) which is due as on May 2025, i.e till the month of passing of this order, with 6% interest per annum , within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to continue depositing the rent at the rate of Rs.22,050/- per month.
Evidence:
The respondent shall continue to deposit in court the rent at the rate of Rs.22,050/- (Rupees Twenty Two Thousand and Fifty only) per month, which may be subsequently fall due, within 15 days from the date of due till the culmination of rent control proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The rent agreement dated 08.08.2023 is produced by the petitioners to establish the rate of rent and the arrears owed.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Abdul Manaf P. U. et al vs Manumol N. M. regarding eviction due to rent arrears
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Manaf P. U. et al vs Manumol N. M. regarding eviction due to rent arrears

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.R. Babu vs Reethamma Lonappan et al regarding eviction under Section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. Renji Cherian et al vs Mr. Mohammed Saheer Sirajudeen et al regarding eviction from rented property.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won