Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No . 82/2021

Case between Abdul Kareem vs Suresh et al regarding dismissal of suit due to absence

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Kareem is the plaintiff who has been continuously absent from the hearings. The defendants, represented by their advocates, attended the court. As a result of the plaintiff's absence, the suit was dismissed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's continuous absence from hearings. The defendants were present and represented by advocates.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's continuous absence from hearings. The defendants were present and represented by advocates.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the plaintiff was absent and had made no representation throughout the proceedings.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff is continuously absent in listed case and not present or represented. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed with cost.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Kareem
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanoop
Party Age
38
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinu
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Latha
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Akhil Raj
Party Age
22
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mohammed Sabah
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jibu P. Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joseph George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit dismissed due to continuous absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is continuously absent in listed case and not present or represented. Dismissed with cost.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Kareem vs Suresh et al regarding dismissal of suit due to absence
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Kareem vs Suresh et al regarding dismissal of suit due to absence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won