Case Summary
This case involves Abdul Kareem Sait who claims that the defendants borrowed Rs.2,25,000/- from him and have failed to repay the outstanding balance. The defendants deny the allegations and assert that no such transaction occurred.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs.1,25,000/- due to lack of sufficient evidence. The plaintiff failed to prove his claims against the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not provide adequate evidence to substantiate his claims.
The plaintiff did not provide adequate evidence to substantiate his claims.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not provide adequate evidence to substantiate his claims.
The plaintiff did not provide adequate evidence to substantiate his claims.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has miserably failed to establish his case.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Kareem Sait
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o Haji Noor Muhammed Sait
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shanoj Payyampally
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o P Mukundan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Roshanara C K
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o U A Ali
Plaintiffs Documents
Legal notice dated 04.09.2020, Acknowledgment cards signed by defendants dated 17.09.2020
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K R Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M S Letha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aswin Venugopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sreerekha K S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Dalbi Emmanuel P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of Rs.1,25,000/- with interest from the defendants.
Evidence:
Accordingly, I have no hesitation to hold that plaintiff is not entitled for any amounts from defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show the legal demand for repayment of the amount owed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence of the defendants acknowledging receipt of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document also serves as evidence of the defendants acknowledging receipt of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Kareem Sait vs Shanoj Payyampally et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Kareem Sait vs Shanoj Payyampally et al regarding realization of money