Case Summary
The case involves Abdul Haseeb as the plaintiff and Sulaikha along with other family members as defendants. The plaintiff sought a partition of property but was absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and there was no instruction from the counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff absent and counsel reported no instruction.
Plaintiff absent and counsel reported no instruction.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. Counsel for the plaintiff reported no-instruction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Haseeb
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulaikha
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Soudath
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subair
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asmabi
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Afeefa
- Party Age
- 19
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.Sreehari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit for partition dismissed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. Counsel for the plaintiff reported no-instruction. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Haseeb vs Sulaikha et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Haseeb vs Sulaikha et al regarding partition