Case Summary
Abdu Rahman Thangal.V.K. is the decree holder while Muhammed Haneefa Sihab Thangal V.K. is the judgment debtor. The case involves an execution petition that was closed due to the delivery not being effected because of the petitioner's fault.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was closed because the delivery was not effected due to the fault of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Delivery not effected due to the fault of the petitioner. Hence EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdu Rahman Thangal.V.K.
- Party Age
- 43
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Haneefa Sihab Thangal V.K.
- Party Age
- 41
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- GOPIKADAVATH
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdu Rahman Thangal.V.K. vs Muhammed Haneefa Sihab Thangal V.K. regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Abdu Rahman Thangal.V.K. vs Muhammed Haneefa Sihab Thangal V.K. regarding Execution Petition