Case Summary
Aarifa Beevi filed a suit against Seena @ Seenath for the realisation of money. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the balance court fee not being remitted. This decision was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aarifa Beevi
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Seena @ Seenath
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.Sujan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to balance court fee not remitted.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not remitted so far. Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aarifa Beevi vs Seena @ Seenath regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Aarifa Beevi vs Seena @ Seenath regarding Realisation of Money