Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Aachiamma, Ruby, and Sabu, filed a suit for declaration, partition, and consequential reliefs. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs failed to appear for the hearing and did not represent themselves.
Plaintiffs failed to appear for the hearing and did not represent themselves.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs failed to appear for the hearing and did not represent themselves.
Plaintiffs failed to appear for the hearing and did not represent themselves.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent no representation. Defendant absent represented. Not adduce any evidence or taken steps to comply appellate judgment.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default. Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 2nd day of July, 2025
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aachiamma
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ruby
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sabu
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shaji
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.Shyama Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- John George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajith A Khadar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aachiamma et al vs Shaji regarding declaration, partition and consequential reliefs
Case Code Year
Case between Aachiamma et al vs Shaji regarding declaration, partition and consequential reliefs