| Niyamam AI

Displaying 376 - 380 of 21891

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between K.Abdul Khadarkutty vs Kerala State et al regarding Mandatory Injunction

Mandatory Injunction

OS. No.429/2022

Kollam

2025-08-21

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Linu.S. Murali vs Kamaludeen et al regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 446/2019

Kollam

2025-08-21

approximately-7 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sivapalan vs Sindhu, Prabhu T.D et al regarding Declaration and Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.787/2024

Kollam

2025-08-22

approximately-1 year 18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vishnu vs N. Muthulakshmi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 828/2018

Kollam

2025-08-23

approximately-6 years 11 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs Guru Kripa Micro Unit (SHG) et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 668/2024

Kollam

2025-08-23

approximately-6 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9644

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to provide required documents to support their claims, leading to dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed for non-payment of batta, which is necessary for processing cases.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Petitioners frequently did not present evidence to establish the financial means of defendants, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Several cases were dismissed due to the petitioners' absence and failing to represent themselves in court.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?