| Niyamam AI

Displaying 321 - 325 of 21888

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sumathi.N vs Sreelatha et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.

Original Suit

OS. No. 232/2017

Kollam

2025-07-23

approximately-7 years 8 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between City Union Bank Ltd. vs Sajeevan et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 600/2018

Kollam

2025-07-28

approximately-7 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Arya.A. regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 863/2024

Kollam

2025-07-28

approximately-1 year 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Renjith Tampi vs Vijayakumaran Pillai regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 136/2023

Kollam District

2025-07-28

approximately-4 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Hayarunnisa vs Ayoob regarding Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 385/2018

Kollam

2025-07-29

approximately-7 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9642

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees or batta, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to prove their claims or the means of the respondents.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Plaintiffs often neglected to issue necessary notices to defendants, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Judgments were frequently dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during court proceedings.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?