| Niyamam AI

Displaying 19441 - 19445 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Marcantile Co-Operative Society Ltd. No.M.793 vs Bapputty et al regarding execution of award

Execution Petition

EXECUTION PETITION NO. 63 OF 2018

Tirur

2019-12-12

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Abdu Razakgh. regarding Loan closure and satisfaction recording

Unknown

EP 197/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-12-12

0 years 6 months 6 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Abdu Razakh. T. regarding decree satisfaction

Execution Proceedings

EP 198/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-12-12

0 years 6 months 6 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between P.K.Hamsakutty vs Alukal Koya regarding Decree Holder and Judgment Debtor

Unknown

EP 266/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-12-12

0 years 4 months 10 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between P.K.Hamsakutty vs Alukal Koya regarding Stay

Unknown

EP 267/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-12-12

0 years 4 months 10 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta fees, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Insufficient evidence presented by plaintiffs regarding respondents' financial means resulted in dismissals.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking necessary procedural steps.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Plaintiffs' failure to appear for hearings led to numerous case dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?