| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18451 - 18455 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Manappuram Asset Finance Ltd. vs Assainar regarding u/s. 138 of N.I. Act.

S.T. No: 14/2015

Tirur

2019-02-06

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Musthafa vs Basheer regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor .Ptn 1047/2018

Malappuram

2019-02-02

0 years, 10 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Shahul Hameed regarding enforcement proceedings.

Enforcement Proceedings

EP 308/2018

Malappuram

2019-02-07

0 years, 1 months, 26 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jahfar vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Pattambi et al regarding Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 295 OF 2016

Tirur

2019-02-08

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between C Alikutty vs Muhammed Fajish regarding offence under N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No:34/2018

Tirur

2019-02-07

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs consistently failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove their claims or the means of the respondents.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Batta

Numerous cases were dismissed due to the petitioners' failure to pay necessary court fees, specifically batta.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Cases were dismissed when the petitioners did not appear in court as required for their petitions.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices or filing required documents.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Petitioners

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?