| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17576 - 17580 of 22158

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Union Bank of India vs Sarun.M.A et al regarding mediation settlement

Civil Suit

O.S No . 698/2022

Ernakulam

2025-03-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. vs Fazila .V.A. et al regarding a monetary dispute.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 931/2023

Ernakulam

2025-03-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Indulekha M B et al vs Muralidharan M B regarding temporary Injunction

Injunction

O.S. No.327/2025

2025-03-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Saju Thomas vs Ajith A. Ambatt regarding compromise of mutual claims

Civil Suit

O.S No . 361/2023

Ernakulam

2025-03-27

Partial

View Full Details

Case between Joseph vs Samson John regarding civil suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 477/2015

Ernakulam

2025-03-27

approximately-9 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9772

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to produce required documents resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment of Fees

Many plaintiffs did not pay necessary court fees or batta, leading to default dismissals.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Plaintiffs' absence during hearings frequently resulted in case dismissals for lack of representation.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims, causing case dismissals.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Necessary Documents

Default Due to Non-Payment of Fees

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Provided

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?