| Niyamam AI

Displaying 911 - 915 of 21897

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between T.S. Salim vs Binu Sebastian regarding a monetary claim

Civil Suit

O.S 57/2023

Kanjirappally

2025-01-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Saraswathyamma vs Manoj K.B. regarding forgery of sale deed.

Civil Suit

O.S 119/2021

Kanjirappally

2025-01-22

approximately-3 years 8 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Travancore Devaswom Board et al vs Mundaakayam Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S 348/2022

Kanjirappally Taluk, Kottayam District

2025-01-21

approximately-3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Lainumol T.N. vs Smitha Sibichan regarding mediation agreement.

Civil Suit

O.S 200/2023

Kanjirappally Taluk

2025-01-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abraham Yesudas, Mathew Yesudas, Aleyamma Ummachan vs null regarding issuance of Succession Certificate

Succession

Succession O.P. 1/2024

Kanjirappally Taluk, Kottayam District

2025-01-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9647

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often did not provide necessary evidence to substantiate their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioners’ failure to appear in court.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary steps to issue court notices, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?