| Niyamam AI

Displaying 71 - 75 of 21805

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Fathima Garments and Stitching Centre regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 452/2023

Kollam

2025-11-25

approximately-6 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Canara Bank vs Syam Krishnan. G et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 144/2018

Kollam

2025-11-26

approximately-7 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Somarajan. P vs Remani et al regarding declaration of easement by grant and injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 402/2019

Kollam

2025-11-26

approximately-6 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs Pooja M Panicker et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 503/2024

Kollam

2025-11-26

approximately-10 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sheela Shaji vs Biju. G.R regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 739/2023

Kollam

2025-11-26

approximately-3 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9602

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

23%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff failed to pay required fees, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support claims, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during hearings, failing to represent their case.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Plaintiff did not take necessary legal actions, such as issuing notices or appearing in court.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?